Your alignment proposal has second-order effects. The Social lens sees them. Do you?

    You've proposed a technical alignment framework. The maths is clean. The benchmarks are promising. But the Social lens asks: who decides the values being aligned to? The Political lens asks: which jurisdiction's norms become the default? The Cultural lens asks: whose definition of "harmful" gets embedded? The Economic lens asks: who profits from being the alignment standard-setter?

    AI safety isn't only a technical problem. It's a governance problem wearing an engineering disguise. Yesbrainer won't fix your alignment architecture. It'll show you the seven non-technical dimensions your paper needs to address before reviewers find them.

    See beyond the architecture →

    Sovereignty as a Service